Wiki / Beam Block / Beam dump

Beam dump

Absorbs incident rays.

Open in the canvas →

Click the beam dump to see its live specs and try its parameters — this mini canvas can't be moved, deleted, or added to.

In the real world

A beam dump ends a beam. Every optical setup produces light that has done its job — the unused port of a beamsplitter, the rejected polarization, the zeroth order off a grating, the beam left over when an experiment is realigned — and all of it has to stop somewhere deliberate. Left alone it lands on a wall, a colleague, or back in the laser.

Doing that well is harder than it sounds, because "absorbing" light is really converting it to heat while reflecting as little as possible. The usual design is geometric rather than material: a cone, a wedge, or a stack of angled vanes, anodised matte black, arranged so that any light not absorbed on first contact reflects deeper into the cavity rather than back out. Several bounces at a few per cent reflectivity each leave a negligible fraction escaping. The black surface does the absorbing; the geometry catches what the surface misses.

Why high-power dumps need cooling

A dump absorbs essentially the entire beam, so it receives the laser's full average power as heat in a small volume. That is a genuine thermal engineering problem, and it sets how a dump is built:

Exceeding a dump's rating is not a small mistake. The anodised layer can burn away, destroying the absorption it was providing and releasing particulates; absorbing glass can crack from thermal shock; and a dump that starts reflecting is worse than no dump at all, because nobody is expecting a beam to come back out of it. Ultrafast lasers add a second constraint: a femtosecond pulse train of modest average power carries enormous peak intensity, and can ablate an absorber that would handle the same average power from a CW source without complaint. Dumps are rated for both.

PabsPinP_{\text{abs}} \approx P_{\text{in}}
The defining property: a dump converts essentially the whole beam to heat, so its thermal load is the full incident power — not a fraction of it.
ReffRNR_{\text{eff}} \approx R^{N}
Why the geometry matters more than the coating: N bounces inside the cavity at surface reflectivity R leave only R^N escaping. Four bounces at 5% reflect back about 6 parts per million.

Safety practice around beam blocks

Beam dumps are the most basic piece of laser safety hardware on a bench, and they work only as part of a wider practice:

None of this is modelled by a ray tracer, and a sketch that looks tidy on screen can still describe a setup that is unsafe to build. Treat a drawing as a plan, not a risk assessment.

In OpticalSetup

The dump is drawn as a closed body whose faces are all absorbing, so any ray that reaches it from any direction stops there and is removed from the trace. Nothing is transmitted, nothing is reflected, and no ray continues past it. The only control is the clear aperture, which sets how large a target it presents.

Its practical use here is the same as on a bench: give the unused ports somewhere to end. Put one on the second output of a beamsplitter, on the rejected port of a polarizing beamsplitter, or on an unwanted diffraction order from a grating, and the figure stops showing a beam wandering off into empty space. It makes a diagram read as a deliberate design rather than an unfinished one, and it is what a reviewer of your figure will look for.

Because a dumped ray is removed rather than attenuated, a dump is also a clean way to isolate one branch of a setup while you study another — block one arm of an interferometer and the remaining path is all that is traced.

Simplified vs. reality

Absorption is total and perfect: there is no residual reflectivity, no wavelength dependence, and no angular limit, whereas a real dump reflects a small fraction and does so more at grazing incidence. Nothing thermal is modelled at all — no absorbed power, no temperature rise, no damage threshold, and no warning when a sketch dumps a kilowatt into a component that could not survive it. The dump's rating and its cooling requirement are entirely the designer's responsibility, and the section above is the only place this tool addresses them.

Related components

Further reading